Tag Archives: Colleges

College Lacrosse Recruiting: “Capitalizing On The Character Component In The College Search For Athletes” By Tom Kovic


Capitalizing on the Character Component in the College Search for Athletes

By Tom Kovic

 The college search for athletes is an “individual” quest. A winning strategy for one prospect could be a losing strategy for another. I think we can all agree that when it comes to recruiting, the “blue chip” kids are going to be found…It’s just a matter of when. 

That being said, the majority of the prospects looking for a home on a college campus and as part of a varsity sports team are NOT blue chip kids and they should execute a personal plan of attack and begin to tackle the “grey areas” of recruiting.


Contributing Factors
Coaches are looking at 3 key characteristics in prospects when determining their level of support for prospects. 1) Strong students, 2) Impact athletes and 3) Kids who bring a strong integrity component to the table.

Coaches can easily evaluate academic talent by combing through high school transcripts and standardized test scores. Athletic assessment can be identified through statistical and video analysis, on site tournament evaluations and conversations with a prospect’s coach. The integrity factor could be a tie breaker in the final analysis.

The Character Component
College coaches are looking for the best and the brightest prospects to help drive their program to higher levels, and these days, they are putting a greater premium on the inner make-up of the prospect. They are looking for boys and girls who display loyalty, dedication, perseverance and a diligent approach to their everyday lives. Coaches want impact kids on the team, but they desperately want kids who will become strong links in the team chain.

Testimonials
College coaches will take a systematic approach in doing a thorough academic and athletic evaluation of a prospect to determine where they fit in their recruit priority chart. Moving forward, especially if the prospect is grouped into the top tier of the recruiting file, a diligent college recruiter will reach out to the high school and/or club coach to determine the inner make-up of the prospect.

Given the choice between a blue chip prospect who may be a potential “loose cannon” on the inside of the team and a solidly skilled prospect who brings a strong character component to the table, college coaches will likely lean toward the latter. And a strong testimonial from the prospects current coach can go a long way in closing the loop in the college evaluation.

Leadership Roles
College coaches are grounded, common-sense individuals who mainly rely on their gut when making a majority of their program decisions, including recruiting. Whether you are the captain of your sports team or a member of student government, it’s important to genuinely embrace these leadership roles in a further effort in building your character foundation.

College coaches have an uncanny ability to size up prospects quickly, efficiently and they can pinpoint a true leadership character as opposed to “resume leadership” in a heartbeat. The self-aware and self-confident prospect is, in most cases, going to shine more brightly in the eyes of the college coaches.

Volunteer Work
Student-athletes can develop character strength in many ways and volunteer work is not only good for the community, it is good for the soul. Reach within yourself and identify areas where you feel you can be impactful. Whether it is working with a local food bank, or coaching a local youth sports group, embrace it with passion and remain committed to your service and believe you can make a difference.

Prospects are considered “special interest” in the eyes of college admissions advisors, especially if college coaches identify them as impact athletes. Coaches use 2 simple and clear cut criteria in determining their support level for athletes: Academic strength and athletic talent. The third criteria is strength of character and in many cases, this can be a key factor that may help prospects separate themselves from the rest of the pack.

Tom Kovic is a former Division I college coach and President of Victory Collegiate Consulting, where he advises prospects and families on college recruiting. Tom is the author of “Reaching for Excellence” An educational guide for college athletics recruiting.” For further information visit:

www.victoryrecruiting.com.

Western College Lacrosse: University Of Colorado Sees Joining Pac-10 “As A Goldmine” For The Buffaloes Athletics Department And Considers ADDING Women’s Lacrosse


 
“…They say they might consider women’s lacrosse first…”
 

  Ticket sales are the No. 1 revenue generator for college sports programs, while gifts and donations are No. 2, notes Boulder-based sports consultant Chuck Neinas, a former College Football Association executive director and Big Eight commissioner. 

 Colorado’s move to the Pac-10 “could well be attractive to people buying more tickets and making more gifts and donations,” Neinas says.

To make more money, though, Colorado will have to spend more. It has long needed facility upgrades, including improvements to the stadium suites that host potential big donors.

The Pac-10′s Scott says he also would like Colorado to add the traditional Pac-10 sports of baseball and softball within five years.  

Bohn and DiStefano hedge on that — “It’s difficult for baseball because of the weather conditions here in Colorado,” DiStefano says, “where March and April are our snowiest months.” They say they might consider women’s lacrosse first. 

“This has been a trend in the past — whenever you try to make more revenue, a lot more costs are added,” says Allen Sack, director for the Institute of Sport Management at the University of New Haven. The advantages of jumping to the Pac-10, though, are expected to extend beyond the bottom line. Sack notes that Miami, when it moved to the Atlantic Coast Conference from the Big East in 2004, underwent “an image change,” especially in terms of academic reputation. Colorado is out from under the cloud of the recruiting scandal, which began with a Boulder County district attorney’s claims that the school used sex and alcohol to lure football recruits. But it was “very much part of the conversations” between the school and Pac-10 before the move was decided, Scott says.

 ”We’re very satisfied that the philosophy and the culture that exists at Pac-10 schools is not only shared but embraced by the leadership of the University of Colorado,” Scott says. So Colorado will head west, mining for gold and goodwill as it goes. 

“The last couple years, people have looked at us in a negative light,” says Darian Hagan, quarterback of the national championship team and now running backs coach. “It’s an opportunity for us to re-brand ourselves, to re-commit ourselves and to just wash everything away and start fresh.”

For more:   http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2010-10-11-colorado-pac-10_N.htm?csp=34sports&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+UsatodaycomCollegeFootball-TopStories+%28Sports+-+College+Football+-+Top+Stories%29

College Lacrosse Recruiting: Tom Kovic Of Victory Collegiate Consulting Discusses “Rising Above Temporary Setbacks In The College Search For Athletes”


The college recruiting process can be a daunting effort if it is not well planned and executed with organization and enthusiasm from start to finish. In addition, one’s mental approach to the college search, especially when checkered with roadblocks, can make the difference between a fair and a great experience. What follows is a “snapshot” on how prospects and families can proactively prepare for and effectively deal with personal setbacks that will undoubtedly surface along the way.

 

College recruiting roadblocks come in different shapes and sizes. Whether it is a direct communication from Coach to inform you his athletic scholarships have been exhausted, or a difficult phone call to inform you that you just don’t have what it takes to impact his team, a good college coach will be honest and forthcoming with prospects and families.

If you happen to be that blue chip athlete that most coaches have their sites on, your recruiting effort will likely have fewer barriers. Conversely, if you are the prospect who sits in the “mid-pack” of athletes where recruiting is brutally competitive’ you will need to prepare better and more effectively to rise above the rest.

As a college advisor for athletes I use a number of exercises to help my families organize for the best and prepare for the worst. Presenting yourself as a worthy candidate needs to be at the top of the list and this can be done in many ways. Whether it is by developing an easy to read personal profile, streaming an eye catching highlight clip, or by cultivating a solid relationship with a college coach through regular communication, the manner in which you present yourself will determine the level of “grip” your recruiting effort will have.

Develop Thick Skin

OK. You have brilliantly crafted your recruiting plan and you are regularly providing the coaches with academic, athletic and personal updates and you have made an unofficial visit to campus. You are feeling confident about the effort you have made and you’re confident it will have some impact. Unfortunately, this is 50% of the battle and the next question is simply…How does Coach see me?

There are going to be some tough questions you will eventually present college coaches, especially when it comes to roster availability, admissions support and financial aid. Before you jump in, I suggest you firstly develop some “tough skin.” Compare the recruiting process to a job interview and I think you’ll see my point. If you have lined up 10 job interviews and they all go brilliantly, do you think you will receive 10 offers? Probably not. Just as the company’s you will eventually interview with, the college coaches are looking for specific candidates to fit specific roles.

If a college coach has to communicate bad news to a prospect, it is not because you have a character flaw and you should never take bad news personally. Considering the volume of recruits that coaches are cultivating, they need to develop a filtering system that will help them trim down their list to a more manageable grouping. A good college coach will be upfront with families and offer truthful and honest communication from start to finish.

Letting go and moving forward

If and when (and you most likely will) receive that phone call from Coach explaining politely that you will no longer be part of the active list of recruits, you have to be able to accept it, let go and move forward. There is no doubt that this can be a hurtful moment, but the prospect that has the ability to “take it,” saddle up and get back “in the moment,” will have a greater chance in grabbing that brass ring.

Everything in this world happens for a reason and where one family may see a negative experience as devastating; another family will see it as an opportunity. One prospect might break down from bad news, while another athlete will rise up, a little tougher, with a little more drive and determination to move on.

For most prospects and families, the college search will not be a straight line, nor will it be a downhill run in finding that right college match. In most cases, it will be a struggle and in that struggle will be intangible life lessons to be learned, hurdles to cross and heartaches to suffer, but in the end and with a proper and realistic approach, the right match is out there and waiting for you to snatch.

Tom Kovic is a former Division I college coach and the current director of Victory Collegiate Consulting (www.victoryrecruiting.com), where he provides advisement and counseling for prospective student-athletes and families in preparing for the college search.

MCLA Men’s Lacrosse: Chapman Men’s Lacrosse Coach Mike Wood Is Fired After Three Seasons And 55-8 Record


Mike Wood, who guided the Chapman program to appearances in the MCLA title game in 2008 and 2009 along with a

Chapman Men's Lacrosse Coach Mike Wood, who guided the program to appearances in the MCLA title game in 2008 and 2009 along with a semifinal berth this spring, was informed his contract would not be renewed in a brief meeting with athletic director David Currey on Monday morning. Photo by LaxBuzz

semifinal berth this spring, was informed his contract would not be renewed in a brief meeting with athletic director David Currey on Monday morning.

Wood follows in the footsteps of Jason Lamb, the long-time coach of Brigham Young with national championships to his credit, who was terminated at this time last spring.

“I did my job and I did it well,” said Wood on Thursday. “We won a lot of games. I’m going to miss the players and 99 percent of the people at Chapman.”

This past spring, Chapman finished 16-3 again. For the third time in as many years, the three-time champion Wolverines bounced the Panthers in the tournament, this time in the semifinals.

In his brief stint at Chapman, Wood posted an overall record of 55-8, and an MCLA mark of 50-7.

Wood attributes his firing to his often contentious relationship with Currey, who hired the former Pomona women’s lacrosse and football coach in 2007.

For more:   http://www.laxmagazine.com/college_men/DIII/2009-10/news/061010_another_one_down_chapmans_wood_fired

Northern California High School Girls Lacrosse Recruiting: Menlo School Girls Lacrosse Midfielder Maggie Brown Will Attend Georgetown And Sacred Heart Prep’s Tory Wilkinson Will Play For Louisville


Menlo School’s Maggie Brown and Sacred Heart Prep’s Tory Wilkinson will leave their Atherton stomping grounds this fall for Georgetown and Louisville, respectively, where the standout midfielders look to reinvent stereotypes about California lacrosse.

“I want to show people that California lacrosse is growing,” said Brown, who was selected to attend a showcase in Florida that includes the top 80 players in the nation. “I want to show them that they should be afraid of us.”

Wilkinson, who first caught the attention of the Louisville coach at a summer camp as the California player, hopes to remove the label and be considered just a lacrosse player.

“Or maybe I can just surprise everyone and be the California player and change their opinion of West Coast lacrosse,” Wilkinson said.

For more:  http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_15115201?nclick_check=1

College Lacrosse Budgets: Cal Berkeley Continues Debate On The “Independent Funding” Of University Sports, Including Lacrosse (Video)


CALTV takes a look at what goes into the budget of Cal Sports and asks: what ought we to take out from it?

Collegerecruiting.tv Launched By Victory Collegiate Consulting To Aid Lacrosse And Other Student-Athletes To Gain Valuable Information On College Atheltics Recruiting


 victorycollegiateconsulting1

 

 Founder and Director of Victory Collegiate Consulting Launches Educational Content Website for High School Student-Athletes and Families

 Boothwyn, Pa. – Tom Kovic, current director of Victory Collegiate Consulting has developed a low cost, simple to navigate and educational website that will help parents and their children gain valuable information on college athletics recruiting.

Collegerecruiting.tv is loaded with published articles written by Kovic who is a former 19 year college coach at The University of Pennsylvania. In addition, the website will offer podcasts and video interviews, along with valuable links to information centers that will further inform families in the areas of financial aid, the NCAA and specific sports sites.
“As an advisor to families and prospective student-athletes throughout the country, I realized the need to develop a resource website that would assist families in building a strong base of information as they develop and implement their plans for the college search. Having written dozens of articles for many online sports magazines, while conducting several interviews, I concluded that there was a natural flow of information that could act as an effective step by step organization tool that families could productively use in preparing for an important life process.”

Kovic’s aim is to provide families and their children with unlimited access to a seamless source of college athletics information that will be easy to grasp and create a strong understanding about how the potentially complicated area of college recruiting works.

For Immediate Release: February 2, 2009

Contact: Tom Kovic
Phone: 610-620-3189
E-mail: Kovic@victoryrecruiting.com

 
 
 

 

Lacrosse Student-Athlete Recruiting Profile: “PrepChamps” CEO Dean Bundschu Talks With LaxBuzz About How Lacrosse Athletes And Their Families Can Maximize Exposure To Top Lacrosse Programs


logo_prepchampsLAXBUZZ: How did you come to create PrepChamps?

deanbundschuDean Bundschu:

Almost every member of the PrepChamps team participated in some high school sport and several members played or coached at the collegiate level. Back in 2006 we began to look for a way to create a company the simplified the recruiting process. We actually thought of the idea when talking to a high school coach that mentioned how he was helping athletes by posting recruiting videos online.

At that point the light bulb went off and we began to think about how we could use technology to help high school athletes get recognized and recruited and college coaches find athletes that meet their programs needs. As we all know, social networking was being to really take off and at the same time, more and more college coaches were using technology to connect with athletes.

Thus we assembled a team of sports enthusiasts and technology experts to build a platform to help this dream become a reality. Recognizing the challenges that many high school student athletes face during the recruiting process, PrepChamps utilizes the power of the Internet to shift the focus toward “Social Recruiting”. PrepChamps is focused on providing high school student athletes with the tools they need to showcase their skills, enhance their exposure, and ultimately improve their chances of getting recognized and recruited.

LAXBUZZ: How many lacrosse student-athletes, boys and girls, would you say are members?
Dean Bundschu: We started by focusing heavily on football and basketball, but lacrosse is one area that we’ve definitely seen growth in. We have about 1000 lacrosse student-athletes on our site today. Some of our lacrosse student-athletes, such as Morgan Cain who committed to Seton Hill University, are getting recruited. (Total membership is over 66,000 members) 

LAXBUZZ: How many college lacrosse coaches participate?

Dean Bundschu: We don’t force college coaches to specify which sport they coach so we can’t give you an exact number. But the feedback we get from coaches is that our site is useful in finding players and building their programs.

LAXBUZZ: Can you name a few Division 1, 2 and 3 schools?


Dean Bundschu: Lacrosse coaches from schools such as Lake Erie College, Florida Southern College, Trinity College, High Point University and McGill University have utilized our website.

LAXBUZZ: What are the 3 top things a lacrosse student-athlete and his or her family can do to best prepare for the recruiting process?

Dean Bundschu: Prepare all recruiting materials a college coach may need to evaluate the student-athlete for their program. (everything in your PrepChamps Profile)

Personal information (Name, mailing address, phone numbers, grade level, school attending, HC contact info, email address, jersey number, position, honors, etc.)

Educational information (GPA, SAT, ACT, if you have cleared the NCAA Clearing House, etc)

Athletic information (Game Highlight Video, stats, honors, etc)

Research

Sit down and discuss which programs best fit the student-athletes goals (Educationally, geographically, system of program, and once they take a visit…how they fit into the dynamic of the TEAM. Also, cover all levels)

Exposure

Do everything you can to get the student-athlete’s name out there!

Send their PrepChamps profile by email to every college that fits their criteria

Mail highlight DVDs to every college that fits their criteria

Attend as many college camps, tournaments, or showcases as possible!

http://www.prepchamps.com/

New “Southwestern Lacrosse Conference”: Chapman, Claremont, Loyola Marymount, UCSB, USC and UCLA (North/West Div.); Arizona, Arizona State, UNLV, UC San Diego, San Diego State and University of San Diego (South/East Div.)


uscarizonalaxpic“…The SLC’s Division II consists of Biola, Cal Lutheran, CSU Fullerton, Concordia, Long Beach State, Occidental, Pepperdine and UC Irvine….”

“…The WCLL had been the best league in the Men’s Collegiate Lacrosse Association (MCLA) and its predecessor, the Men’s Division Intercollegiate Associates, for years…” 

http://laxmagazine.cstv.com/sports/s-club/spec-rel/120308aaa.html

As they lingered by Sonoma State’s lacrosse fields where the Adrenaline Elite Camp was held over the summer, several coaches and administrators from Western Collegiate Lacrosse League (WCLL) Division I teams talked amongst themselves while viewing potential recruits.

There was Matt Holman, head coach of San Diego State, Chris Malone of Arizona State, Mike Wood of national runner-up Chapman, Gary Podesta, the president of the WCLL and head coach at Santa Clara, and Mike Annala, the academic advisor for Sonoma State. As was custom those days, talk quickly turned to the state of the conference.

The WCLL had been the best league in the Men’s Collegiate Lacrosse Association (MCLA) and its predecessor, the Men’s Division Intercollegiate Associates, for years. Recently, however, the cumbersome logistics of the league – 20 teams spread over four, uneven divisions and a geographical area covering roughly the same distance between New York City and Jacksonville, Fla. – had spurred talk of movement.

There was more urgency in the voices this time, spurred by recent developments.

It appeared a solution to the problems had been brokered earlier in the year with Arizona State’s application for membership in the Rocky Mountain Lacrosse Conference, a four-team league looking to up its numbers to six for an automatic qualifier to the MCLA championships. In an effort to hit the mark, the RMLC mandated that Arizona be part of the package with the Sun Devils. Without a coach at the time, UA declined, sinking the entire venture.

Determined to realign, WCLL coaches at the Sonoma camp hunkered down and put a tentative plan together.

“I think the seeds of the split were sown during that time, with all the coaches agreeing to work towards a smooth split and everyone having tasks to perform,” confirmed Annala, who is also the WCLL treasurer.

The split would allow for the continuation of the WCLL along with the advent of a new conference, tentatively named the Southwestern Collegiate Conference. Coaches hit the phones – and the road – to make it happen as quickly as possible.

 

 

Wood, Malone and Holman culled the rest of the southern WCLL teams who were interested in diverging, laying the groundwork for the fledgling organization. Meanwhile, Podesta and Craig Miller, the WCLL vice president, gave a presentation to the MCLA board in August to nail down an automatic qualifier for the SCC this spring.

With a dozen teams committed, an AQ in hand and a new name – now the Southwestern Lacrosse Conference – the break from the WCLL was official. The North/West division of the SLC consists of Chapman, Claremont, Loyola Marymount, UCSB, USC and UCLA; the South/East has Arizona, Arizona State, UNLV, UC San Diego, San Diego State and the University of San Diego.

“The travel logistics really panned out well for everybody – the remaining WCLL teams and the ones that split,” said Holman, who is now the SLC president. “Creating two conferences in the same region where we’ve all historically been used to traveling was really something we talked about with the [MCLA] requirement to play so many out-of-conference teams.”

The remaining WCLL teams – Sonoma State, Cal Poly, Chico State, Stanford, Santa Clara, Cal, UC Davis, Nevada and San Jose State – helped in the realignment, especially regarding financial issues.

“The WCLL agreed to equitably divide assets to help the SLC in their efforts, and the core SLC leadership has done an admirable job taking care of business and developing their organization,” said Annala. “That is not to say there are not wistful memories of what the WCLL represented and accomplished in its 35-year history.”

And the WCLL has accomplished quite a bit.

Not only can the WCLL take a share of the credit in building lacrosse in California and Arizona – something the SLC has pledged to continue – but it also had some of the most demanding academic requirements of any league. Unlike the MCLA, which simply requires student-athletes to carry a 12-credit course load in the spring to be eligible, the WCLL stipulates student-athletes must carry a full, 12-credit slate in the fall, as well, and maintain a 2.0 grade point average.

The SLC kept much of the same structure and bylaws of its parent league in its inaugural Oct. 4 league meeting. However, the league coaches voted 13-3 to discontinue the WCLL’s academic standards and adopt the MCLA baseline.

Having an automatic qualifier and possibly getting more awards for his players motivated Wood, Chapman’s head coach, to push for the split. But moving away from the WCLL rules that so closely mirrored those of the NCAA did not sit well with Wood, who is also an assistant football coach for the Panthers.

“Why should I be coaching football players here that abide by those rules and my lacrosse players don’t? When I sat down with my AD, he said, `I thought you guys were going from the beer-drinking league to being recognized as trying to be an NCAA thing.’ I said, `Yeah, that’s why I voted to keep the rules as they were,’” said Wood. “The WCLL has been around for 20 years, and those guys worked hard to get those rules to where they were at, and, in one fell swoop, we changed the league and cancelled the rules.”

Annala, and many of the remaining WCLL personnel, expected as much.

“The decision by the southern teams to eschew more stringent eligibility requirements did not come as a surprise to members of the WCLL Board of Directors,” said Annala. “With the increase in the number of young coaches in the SLC, there had been rumblings that the standards were too hard to keep up with for coaches who only wanted to coach and not necessarily follow up on their player’s academic progress.”

Holman, who also voted to keep the WCLL’s academic standards, said that while there were disagreements over this issue, it wasn’t one of the reasons for the genesis of the SLC. “You really had to be at the meeting to see that the discussion was well presented, for both arguments, and that it was not a reason to enact the split,” he said.

Eligibility standards appear to be mostly an effect, not a cause, of the SLC break-off from the WCLL, and it’s an issue that might be revisited in the future. Also, in an effort to promote lacrosse at the collegiate level, the SLC has decided to let several junior colleges play under its organizational flag (not for playoffs or awards), which could have influenced the accepted eligibility guidelines.

“They don’t become members of the MCLA, but we felt it was a wise thing to do,” said Holman. “If they’re out there, why not give them an opportunity to play under our organization? California has a lot of junior colleges and, unless you research it, you don’t notice it.”

The split between the WCLL and the SLC became a reality when a bunch of guys decided to brainstorm during a summer camp, and it is now a reality for the 2009 season. But it doesn’t mean the two leagues have washed their hands of each other. With the MCLA’s non-conference game requirements, the presence of two conferences in the same region will provide both the WCLL and SLC easy dates in their quest for national berths. Instead of being adversaries, the symbiotic relationship should help both leagues.

“I don’t think anyone’s feelings were hurt,” said Holman. “I think everybody realized it was good for all. I think it’s going to be kind of cool, and everyone will enjoy it.”

Slides & Rides
- The SLC’s Division II consists of Biola, Cal Lutheran, CSU Fullerton, Concordia, Long Beach State, Occidental, Pepperdine and UC Irvine. Teams will be eligible for an automatic qualifier to the MCLAs, although Biola (La Mirada, Calif.) will not play in the playoffs. Due to a carryover infraction from the 2008 WCLL rules, the Eagles will be on a yearlong probation.

- There will be six-team playoff in SLC D-I, with the two division winners earning byes and the rest of the teams being seeded by record. This does not necessarily mean that each division will receive three bids, as there could be fourth team coming out of one and just two out of the other. The playoffs are April 24-26 at the University of San Diego. SLC D-II will have a four-team playoff featuring the top four eligible programs.

- I always wondered why I could never find club programs in the Chicago area, like Northwestern and University of Chicago, or in Wisconsin, like UW-Madison and any of the other satellite schools in the state system, when I searched the MCLA and NCLL ranks. Well, I finally found out why. They belong to their own association: the Great Lakes Lacrosse League. Started by Hal Rosenberg, the league is seven years old and boasts 30 teams. According to Rosenberg, he started the GLLL because the MCLA was not receptive to the development of a Wisconsin-based conference and just wanted the area schools to join the Upper Midwest Lacrosse League.

Rosenberg, who is also the head coach at Wisconsin-Madison, keeps the travel and costs to a minimum in his league. “It is an alternate model and has helped grow the sport tremendously in this area of the country,” he said. “The low cost and minimal travel has made it possible for small programs to get started and grow.” It’s that kind of strategic thinking that keeps lacrosse growing.

- Kentucky is moving from the NCLL to the MCLA this year. The Wildcats will play in the SELC…The WCLL and SLC have formed separate conferences, but Matt Holman, the SLC president, hopes to have a WCLL-SLC “Game of the Week” starting in 2010 to highlight some of the old rivalries within the league. Sonoma State-UCSB is always a dandy…Indiana and Purdue are moving from the Central Collegiate Lacrosse Association to the Great Rivers Lacrosse Conference this spring. They’ll join traditional Big 10 rivals Iowa and Illinois…Think you’ve got to wait a while for the first lacrosse game of the season? Well, Claremont plays Biola on Jan. 24. That’s 52 days.

“InsideLacrosse Blog LaxHerWay”: What Should “Lacrosse” Recruits Expect?


FROM “LaxHerWay” BLOG IN “INSIDELACROSSE”:

recruit“…A student athlete is a full time student with a full time job. Their season can run (by NCAA rules) 132 days a year, excluding days off. They are full-time students that also must (at the Division I level) endure 20 hours a week of practice in season (maximum by NCAA rules in the fall or spring, which is defined differently by each school)…”

“…By NCAA rules, teams must give a day off each 14 days, but that day can be any within a two week span. So, a student-athlete could get a day off and then go straight 13 days of playing/practicing, and then 13 more days before being off the last day of the second of the two week period…”

 ”…I felt a great burden to perform in exchange for that opportunity for an education and a chance to play lacrosse. By the time I started thinking about it and asking the questions and wondering where I was going after graduation, it was too late. I was two years into a degree that really did not interest me, but it fit my practice schedule…”

http://blogs.insidelacrosse.com/2008/11/20/laxherway-what-should-recruits-expect/ 

A student athlete is a full time student with a full time job. Their season can run (by NCAA rules) 132 days a year, excluding days off. They are full-time students that also must (at the Division I level) endure 20 hours a week of practice in season (maximum by NCAA rules in the fall or spring, which is defined differently by each school). Yes, that is 20 hours of actual field time. In addition to that, you add time getting there, in the training room, the locker room, and the hours start mounting.

Out of season, when teams are not officially in fallball or the spring season, each athlete can practice up to eight hours per week, including running, lifting and individual sessions — a full-time job and they have to go to class.

Also, there aren’t a lot of days off. By NCAA rules, teams must give a day off each 14 days, but that day can be any within a two week span. So, a student-athlete could get a day off and then go straight 13 days of playing/practicing, and then 13 more days before being off the last day of the second of the two week period. That boils down to being a full-time student and then working after classes for 26 straight days.

For those athletes and families who are counting and look at these actual days, times and rules some might even realize that their very own program may need to look within itself and ponder whether they need to re-evaluate the definition of the “student-athlete.”

I wonder if, in the great uproar to grab that lacrosse scholarship, the actual student-athlete and her family realizes what it entitles her to other than that financial help. I wonder how many just follow along aimlessly not knowing their rights. Does anyone ever really read the NCAA Student-Athlete Handbook that the NCAA provides for free? Does anyone ever ask whether they are putting in too many hours?

And if you are counting and actually pondering this amazing amount of time spent on something that not only does not earn you credits, but other than coaching, really can’t get you a job, do you actually think that the NCAA has the best interest of the student-athlete at heart?

I know I never questioned. I know I never asked. I knew one thing. WIN. That was all that mattered. I knew I felt a great burden to perform in exchange for that opportunity for an education and a chance to play lacrosse. By the time I started thinking about it and asking the questions and wondering where I was going after graduation, it was too late. I was two years into a degree that really did not interest me, but it fit my practice schedule. I was stuck, because it was a small liberal arts school and not a larger university, so the offerings were a bit narrower. I worked hard. I earned ten varsity letters (three in field hockey, three in swimming and four in lacrosse). I went to almost all my early morning scheduled classes so my afternoon was free for practices and games and I held a part-time job.

I was a product of the system. It may not sound like it, but as a beneficiary of that system, I am a believer in it. But I would be smarter now; I would ask more questions. I would place my trust more carefully. I got into school because I was an athlete. I took a slot from someone that probably deserved to be there more than I did because I could play a game. I graduated with a degree and have worked hard ever since. I look at the game today and see the amount of stress it brings to all parties involved. I wonder if anyone really plays for fun any more. I know that whether I am coaching a tyker team, inner-city team or the U.S. Team, I strive to make the game fun. I strive to give the athlete the voice and keep the sidelines quieter. I have asked for trust in, and accountability to, each other because in my book these are the things we will carry forward. These are the things that will make us better people. These are the things that matter. These are the things that just might be worth the price of that scholarship. I hope so.

Sue Heether is a former goalie and All-American from Loyola College (’90) and World Cup Champion (’93, ‘97, ‘01). She is currently the Head Coach of the US Elite Team and President of Sports Her Way, Inc. To see all the women’s lacrosse stuff go to www.sportsherway.com