Daily Archives: March 2, 2010

Lacrosse Equipment: New NCAA Stick Regulations Has Turned Up One “Illegal” Head…The STX Professor, Which Is One-Eighth Of An Inch Too Narrow

Three weeks into the college men’s lacrosse season, there’s been nary a peep about the new NCAA stick regulations that sent manufacturers into an uproar — no crippling penalties or embarrassing Bill McGlone moments.

But according to several NCAA officials and coaches of STX-sponsored programs, one of the manufacturer’s 2010 models, the Professor, has turned up illegal.

“The STX Professor appears to be one-eighth of an inch too narrow between the bottom two measurements – at 1.25 and 3 inches above the base of the head,” said David Seidman, a veteran lacrosse official from Maple Glen, Pa.

The question of how to handle these heads has been raised to the NCAA Rules Committee.

“Their current instructions are to penalize all illegal sticks,” Seidman said. “The discussion is ongoing.”

Johns Hopkins and Delaware, both STX-sponsored Division I programs, managed to go the distance without an illegal equipment penalty in the No. 5-ranked Blue Jays 15-7 victory Tuesday over the No. 13-ranked Blue Hens. But coaches on both sides said they are aware of the borderline-legal stick heads.

“Some of these sticks are so close to the exact measurements, that they come out of the box like that,” said Delaware head coach Bob Shillinglaw. “You can’t let your guard down.”

The new specifications, which are meant to make dislodging the ball easier and encourage a more fluid passing game, require that all heads be a minimum of 3 inches wide at 1.25 and 3 inches above the base of the head, a minimum of 3.5 inches wide further up the head and a minimum of 6 inches wide at the top of the head.

Some heads that meet the specs dead-on have become illegal due to the tension created when they are strung or softening of the plastic after use.

“Every head that’s leaving our distribution facility is measuring in at spec or over spec,” said STX general manager Jason Goger, who contended that the company’s research does not bear out what he called rumors.

“We’ve had over 100 Division I games played so far this season and there has been one official game with infractions. There were two infractions at the Navy-VMI game Feb. 15, and I think that got everyone really jittery to start,” Goger said. “There’s a lot of angst and curiosity to begin the season, and the facts outweigh the rumors now in the stick infractions and how officials are interpreting the new rule.”

With multiple measurements now required, NCAA officials have begun using a hard plastic template that doubles as a scorecard. The template, designed by Lacrosse International, must fit inside the head for it to be legal. Coaches have been sent copies of the same template.

“There’s no fudge factor,” Seidman said.

Officials have singled out the STX Professor as the most notably non-compliant head. “The sidewalls actually curve inward slightly,” Seidman said, “and our measurement template doesn’t fit into the head.”

But the issue stems beyond make and model. Other manufacturers’ heads have historically cut it close with regard to NCAA regulations.

“Most sticks are barely legal out of the box,” Johns Hopkins assistant coach Bobby Benson said. “It’s always been like that. The only one that’s not borderline is the new Xcalibur, the X10.”

Benson said he did not know of any Blue Jays who use the Professor. Hopkins has not had an illegal stick in any of its three games, and Benson said all of the team’s current STX models meet specs.”We’ve had no issues with any of our sticks,” he said.

Since plastic heads are hard, but malleable, questionable heads can be stretched to spec. It’s a far cry from pinching, the preferred form of stick alteration before the new specs surfaced, and much ado about nothing, if you ask Benson.

Asked if the new stick specs had any bearing on the field, Benson said, “It hasn’t made a difference. If they want to change the game and bring back checking, they need to get rid of offset heads.”

Tank the game’s most influential technological advancement in the last 20 years? Now that would be cause for an uproar.

Western College Men’s Lacrosse: MCLA Division I Lacrosse “Player Of The Year” Update

 

 
 

Connor Martin, Attack, Chapman. Photo by LaxBuzz

Connor Martin, Attack, Chapman
The Panthers are off to a 6-0 start, backed by Martin’s 17 goals and six assists. Now in control of the Panther’s offense, Martin has the ability to beat his man one-on-one but can also find the open man when the defense slides.

Trevor Yealy, Attack, Michigan
The two-time defending national champions are just kicking off the regular season after a successful scrimmage schedule in which they went 3-0 against Division I Bellarmine and DIII Wittenberg and Ohio Wesleyan. The Wolverines beat Arizona 15-5 in their regular season opener with Yealy tallying six goals.

Kevin Zorovich, Attack, Michigan
Zorovich missed much of the preseason with an injury but was back for the team’s opener against ‘Zona, putting up five assists in the win.

 

 

Elliot Grow, Midfield, BYU. Photo by LaxBuzz

Elliot Grow, Midfield, BYU

The Cougars are 3-1 to start the season, the lone loss coming by a single goal to Chapman early in the season. Grow leads the way with 12 goals and 2 assists on an offense that relies heavily on its midfield.

Britt Cone, LSM, BYU
Cone quietly turned in one of the best performances in the BYU/Chapman game, which was one of the marquee matchups to start the season and possibly one of the most anticipated all year. Cone has picked up a whopping 25 ground balls on the season to go with two goals and two assists, jump starting the BYU transition.

Eric Nelson, Attack, Arizona State
A bit of an unknown entering the season, the Sun Devils have outscored opponents 69-25 through their first four games – all wins – with much of the offense being generated from the stick of Nelson (10 goals, 11 assists), who coach Chris Malone said has always produced but has flown under the radar for most of his career.

Ryan Westfall, Midfield, Arizona State
Often paired in the same sentence with his brother Tyler, Ryan Westfall has separated himself slightly in the Player of the Year watch. His nine goals and seven assists put him second (to Nelson) on the team in points but it’s his hustle that’s made an impact on ASU’s hot start – he’s picked up 12 ground balls, a team high.

John Goodrich, Goalie, Florida State
The Seminoles are another team well into their 2010 schedule, posting a 7-0 record through this point, including wins over Michigan State and Boston College. While the offense has averaged almost 17 goals per game, Goodrich has posted an impressive .753 save percentage and a 3.83 goals against average, good for first in the MCLA.

Ben Towner and Adam Foss, Attack, Simon Fraser
Simon Fraser beat Western Washington 18-3 on February 6 and haven’t played a game since, taking time off (from games, not practices) while the Winter Olympics went off in their backyard. The Clansmen tackle the meat of their schedule starting this Friday against Colorado State and Towner and Foss are the centerpieces of an offense that will be one of the tops in the MCLA.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2010/03/02/mcla-player-year-watch-march-2

Western College Men’s Lacrosse: #11 Colorado State Men’s Lacrosse Faces #3 Simon Fraser In March 5 In “Rocky Mountain Lacrosse Classic”, Also Featuring Kent Denver Boys Lacrosse Vs. Mountain Vista

Colorado State men’s lacrosse will take on Simon Fraser on March 5 at Shea Stadium in Denver as part of a double header with the Mountain Vista high school and Kent Denver high school lacrosse game.

“We have a nice history with SFU, even though we haven’t played them in several years,” Head Coach Alex Smith said. “Way back in 1999, we beat them for our first national championship.  They have really improved over the past several seasons and become a dominant team, especially on offense.  We will need a focused team effort to stop some of their better players,” he said.

CSU has had a powerful beginning to its season. The team’s overall record this season is 3-0, and they recently swept back to back games against Lindenwood University and Texas. This game will provide a challenge for the Rams, as Simon Fraser is the best team they have seen this year, according to Smith.

“They are legitimate contenders for the national title, and for us to be in the conversation about playing for a championship, this is the type of team we need to be competitive with,” Smith said.  

SFU is ranked # 3 in the MCLA LaxMag Adidas Top 23 Poll and # 4 in the CollegeLax.us Prodigy Network Top 25 Poll. The polls were released on Monday, February 22 and Thursday, February 25 respectively. They have recently begun their season, winning their first game against Western Washington.  CSU will be their second opponents this season.

The game is being deemed the Rocky Mountain Lacrosse Classic, and will be held at Shea Stadium in Highlands Ranch at 7:30, after a game between Mountain Vista and Kent Denver high schools. Tickets are $5 and can be purchased at the gate. For more information on events and door prizes, visit www.csulacrosse.com.

College Lacrosse Recruiting: “Successful Independent Search In The College Recruiting Process” (Victory Collegiate Consulting)

http://www.victoryrecruiting.com/

Independent navigation in college recruiting can be a daunting effort. Whether it’s investigating NCAA rules and recruiting time-lines or developing and implementing tactics to “get on the radar” of the college coaches on your “A” list of schools, an organized and informed approach to the college quest will give prospects and families the best chance at success.


Gather Information

Gathering information is critical to the successful organization of any worthy project. Building a college recruiting information base can begin as early as the ninth grade as a family hobby and increasingly grow into a highly organized, disciplined project by the end of the junior year.


Begin by gathering information on the potential colleges of choice, including team and coach profiles, statistics, ranking, and academic options. Continue to update and maintain individual e-files on these favorite college programs.


Set Goals and Develop Your Plan

A knowledgeable consumer will have a clear edge in the pursuit of the attainment of important goals. I believe that the same holds true in the college search and I encourage families to make every effort and commitment to organize pertinent information regarding this process and to execute well-designed plans.


Develop timelines that will target general events in the beginning of the college search (making unofficial visits, maintaining your data base, and attending tournaments) and continue to move forward with more specific events (compiling a video and player profile, communicating with coaches, and making official visits, etc.) as your search progresses. This will increase the chances of “hitting targets” throughout the process.


Run the Offense (Execute)

OK. Your plans are complete, well constructed and clearly spelled out in a language everyone understands. Your calendar is updated and you have listed everything from the next round of SAT’s to the fall homecoming dance! Now it’s time to take the plunge.


You can have the best organized and most highly detailed approach to the college quest, but it won’t amount to a hill of beans if you lack confidence, the desire, and the ability to “execute the plan.” If your strategy is to wait by the phone for the coach to call, in most cases, it’s going to be a long wait. Top prospects will get their fair share of attention, but the majority of athletes will increase their chances in getting on the radar screen of the college coaches by taking a proactive stance and initiating communication with college coaches.


College coaches are strictly bound by a myriad of NCAA contact and evaluation rules that limit them in initiating contact with prospective student-athletes and their families. What few families realize is that although college coaches may have their “hands tied” to some degree, prospects may initiate contact with the college coaches, early on and with very few exceptions


Persistence

The dictionary definition of persistence is: Continuing in spite of opposition; Enduring, lasting or recurrent. In a nutshell, I feel strongly that a persistent effort in every aspect of the college search for athletes will, in the end, give them and their families the greatest chance at success.

The one common thread that helps weave my college quest plans for the families I work with is the necessity to embrace persistence as a critical tool in the recruiting arsenal from start to finish. Some believe a persistent approach in college recruiting will be viewed by college coaches as a “pushy” attempt to get on the radar. It could come across this way if your approach is not well planned and carefully executed.

The rule of thumb here is simple: Coaches want to hear from prospects and considering the tight latitude they have in communicating with prospects, coaches’ welcome and encourage kids to drop them an e-mail or pick up the phone and call. That said, it is equally important for prospects to have a realistic view of their potential athletic contribution to a particular program.

Work as a Team

The team approach during the college athletics recruiting process is suggested to maximize efficiency and minimize individual pressure and stress as families navigate a potentially daunting effort. Forming a trustworthy group of individuals who play specific roles during the recruiting cycle will increase your chances of reaching pre-determined goals.

When working your recruiting plan within a team (prospect, parents, club/high school coach, and college advisor) dynamic, the responsibility in effectively executing your recruiting plan is equally distributed to the area experts. All assignments should be clearly spelled out, and communication between team members should be often and consistent. This will help streamline the complete operation of the project and assist the family in avoiding any confusion that could contribute to unclear thinking, misdirection and potentially poor choices.

 
 

 

You have the drive and the desire to take your athletic talent to the next level. You are confident and dedicated to participating as part of a college team and making your athletic pursuit an important compliment to your overall college experience. You are half way there. Remember, your college search is a personal quest, where maintaining “momentum” will make the difference between a fair and great college recruiting experience. Leave nothing to chance and make the commitment to treat the college search as you would treat your goal to experience a championship season.


Tom Kovic is a former Division I college coach and President of Victory Collegiate Consulting, where he provides individual advisement for families on college recruiting. Tom is the author of “Reaching for Excellence” An educational guide for college athletics recruiting and 120 Q and A’s about College Athletics Recruiting. For further information visit: www.victoryrecruiting.com.

College Men’s Lacrosse: #2 Virginia Men’s Lacrosse Defeated #18 Stony Brook 18-3 (Video)

The #2 Virginia Men’s Lacrosse team defeats #18 Stony Brook at the Turf Field behind timely offensive, faceoff wins, and a great performance by goalie Adam Ghitelman.